Law relating to the negotiable instruments act / (Record no. 199)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 04090nam a2200253Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20241115103223.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 240314s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD BOOK NUMBER
International Standard Book Number 9789391211233
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Transcribing agency .
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number 346.09654
Item number AIY
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Aiyar, S. Krishnamurthi
245 #0 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Law relating to the negotiable instruments act /
Statement of responsibility, etc. by S. Krishnamurthi Aiyar
250 ## - EDITION STATEMENT
Edition statement 14th ed.
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. Gurgaon:
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. LexisNexis Publications,
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2022.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent clxxviii, 1253p. ;
Dimensions 25cm.
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE
Formatted contents note Introduction<br/>The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881<br/>Chapter 1 : Preliminary<br/>Chapter 2 : Of Notes, Bills and Cheques<br/>Chapter 3 : Parties to Notes, Bills and Cheques<br/>Chapter 4 : Of Negotiation<br/>Chapter 5 : Of Presentment<br/>Chapter 6 : Interest<br/>Chapter 7 : Of Discharge from Liability on Notes, Bills and Cheques<br/>Chapter 8 : Of Notice of Dishonour<br/>Chapter 9 : Of Noting and Protest<br/>Chapter 10 : Of Reasonable Time<br/>Chapter 11 : Of Acceptance and Payment for Honour and Reference in Case of Need<br/>Chapter 12 : Of Compensation<br/>Chapter 13 : Special Rules of Evidence<br/>Chapter 14 : Of Crossed Cheques<br/>Chapter 15 : Of Bills in Sets<br/>Chapter 16 : Of International Law<br/>Chapter 17 : Of Penalties in case of Dishonour of certain Cheques for Insufficiency of Funds in the Accounts<br/>Chapter 18 : Of Penalties in case of Dishonour of certain Cheques<br/>Subject Index<br/>Table of Cases
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The present fourteenth edition marks more than 15 years of our association with this book as its revising author, which we have been doing since the 9th Edition which was published in the year 2005. The book has attained acclaim and acceptability by its readers from its very inception. After the last edition of the year 2016, some legislative changes have been made in the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Parliament by inserting section 143A and section 148 by Act 20 of 2018. Now, the trial court trying the criminal complaint filed under section 138 of the NI Act may award interim compensation to the complainant up to 20% of the amount of the dishonoured cheque. In addition, the Appellate Court is empowered by section 148 to direct deposit of 25% or more amount of the fine or compensation by Appellant/convicpending appeal subject to the outcome of appeal. Case-laws on these newly added provision have been updated in the present edition. The burden of proof on prosecution and accused in criminal cases is not on a level-playin field. As against the prosecution's rigorous burden of proving its case beyond reasonable doubt the accused is required by law to discharge burden of proving his case on a lighter scale preponderance of probabilities. As is well settled, the presumption under section 139 can rebutted and the standard of proof for doing so is that of 'preponderance of probabilities. the phrase 'preponderance of probability' is not defined anywhere in the Act nor it seems to been defined and explained in any other Act. However, in Punita Rai v State of Jharkhand<br/>another, the expression preponderance of 'probability' has been very well explained as under:<br/>The expression "preponderance of probability" has not been defined in any statute, however, in my opinion, it cannot be mere pretence of an accused. This expression refers to a positive finding on facts which are referable to probability of a situation which is more likely to happen, but it is not just a possibility. An accused can show from evidence of the prosecution or by leading evidence himself that the case set up by him is a probable one. To show that the defence set up by him is probable one the accused must show from the prosecution's evidence or by leading such cogent evidence which would prima-facie disclose a strong probability of the defence set up by him." (Source : https://lawbookshop.net/law-negotiable-instruments-act-comments-case-law-dishonour-cheques-s-k-sarvaria-s-krishnamurthi-aiyar-apoorva-sarvaria.html)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element India
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Negotiable instruments India
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element Negotiable instruments
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Sarvaria, Apoorv
Relator term Author
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Koha item type Books
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
        Central Library Central Library   15/03/2024   346.09654 AIY 000199 15/03/2024 15/03/2024 Books

Facts & Statistics

Printed Books

2132

e - Books

400

Print Journals

27

e - Journals

50

Online Databases

10


© Gujarat National Law University. All Rights Reserved.