| Formatted contents note |
Acknowledgements<br/>Introduction Jennifer H. Arlen and Eric L. Talley<br/>PART I EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE COASE THEOREM<br/>1. Elizabeth Hoffman and Matthew Spitzer (1982), ‘The Coase Theorem: Some Experimental Tests’<br/>2. Stewart Schwab (1988), ‘A Coasean Experiment on Contract Presumptions’<br/>3. Rachel Croson and Jason Scott Johnston (2000), ‘Experimental Results on Bargaining Under Alternative Property Rights Regimes’<br/>PART II LOSS AVERSION: ENDOWMENT EFFECTS, FRAMING EFFECTS, STATUS QUO BIAS<br/>A Endowment Effects<br/>4. Daniel Kahneman, Jack L. Knetsch and Richard H. Thaler (1990), ‘Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem’<br/>5. Jennifer Arlen, Matthew Spitzer and Eric Talley (2002), ‘Endowment Effects within Corporate Agency Relationships’<br/>6. Charles R. Plott and Kathryn Zeiler (2005), ‘The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the “Endowment Effect”, Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations’<br/>B Framing Effects<br/>7. Edward J. McCaffery, Daniel J. Kahneman and Matthew L. Spitzer (1995), ‘Framing the Jury: Cognitive Perspectives on Pain and Suffering Awards’<br/>8. Russell Korobkin and Chris Guthrie (1997), ‘Psychology, Economics, and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of the Lawyer’<br/>PART III SETTLEMENT BEHAVIOUR, SELF-SERVING BIAS AND THE ROLE OF LAWYERS<br/>9. Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein, Samuel Issacharoff and Colin Camerer (1995), ‘Biased Judgments of Fairness in Bargaining’<br/>10. George Loewenstein and Don A. Moore (2004), ‘When Ignorance is Bliss: Information Exchange and Inefficiency in Bargaining’<br/>11. Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein and Samuel Issacharoff (1998), ‘Creating Convergence: Debiasing Biased Litigants’<br/>12. Greg Pogarsky and Linda Babcock (2001), ‘Damage Caps, Motivated Anchoring, and Bargaining Impasse’<br/>PART IV FAIRNESS, TRUST AND CROWDING OUT<br/>13. Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe, Keith Shachat and Vernon Smith (1994), ‘Preferences, Property Rights, and Anonymity in Bargaining Games’<br/>14. Elizabeth Hoffman, Kevin McCabe and Vernon L. Smith (1996), ‘Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games’<br/>15. Robert H. Frank, Thomas Gilovich and Dennis T. Regan (1993), ‘Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?’<br/>16. Ernest Fehr, Alexander Klein and Klaus M. Schmidt (2007), ‘Fairness and Contract Design’<br/>17. Iris Bohnet, Bruno S. Frey and Steffen Huck (2001), ‘More Order with Less Law: On Contract Enforcement, Trust, and Crowding’<br/>18. Daylian M. Cain, George Loewenstein and Don A. Moore (2005), ‘The Dirt on Coming Clean: Perverse Effects of Disclosing Conflicts of Interest’<br/>PART V REASONING ABOUT RISK AND LOSS<br/>A Legal Rules and Deterrence<br/>19. Lewis Kornhauser and Andrew Schotter (1990), ‘An Experimental Study of Single-Actor Accidents’<br/>20. Uri Gneezy and Aldo Rustichini (2000), ‘A Fine Is a Price’<br/>B Assessment of Risk by Judges and Juries<br/>21. Kim A. Kamin and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski (1995),’ Ex Post ≠ Ex Ante: Determining Liability in Hindsight’<br/>22. Alison C. Smith and Edith Greene (2005), ‘Conduct and its Consequences: Attempts at Debiasing Jury Judgments’<br/>23. W. Kip Viscusi and Richard J. Zeckhauser (2004), ‘The Denominator Blindness Effect: Accident Frequencies and the Misjudgment of Recklessness’<br/>C Impact of Decision Rules on Juries<br/>24. Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich (2001), ‘Inside the Judicial Mind’<br/>25. David Schkade, Cass R. Sunstein and Daniel Kahneman (2000), ‘Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift’<br/>26. Serena Guarnaschelli, Richard D. McKelvey and Thomas R. Palfrey (2000), ‘An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules’ |
