Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Presidential legislation in India: The Law and Practice of Ordinances / by Shubhankar Dam

By: Material type: TextTextSeries: Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy | Ginsburg, Tom ; | Elkins, Zachary ; | Hirschl, Ran ; Publication details: New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Description: xviii, 259p.; 23cmISBN:
  • 9781107546028
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 328.54077  DAM
Contents:
Part I. Origins and Practice: 1. The transplant effect: early origins of ordinances in England and India 2. Surrogate legislation: an empirical account of ordinances, 1952–2009 Part II. Law and Interpretation: 3. Negotiating the text: ordinances, Article 123, and the interpretative deficit 4. Reading minds: presidential satisfaction and judicial review of ordinances 5. The power of no: presidents, cabinets, and the making of ordinances. Bibliography Index
Summary: "The legislative process in India's parliamentary system, like elsewhere, is a shared exercise: the executive and the legislature partake in it. Ordinarily, proposals for legislation originate in the cabinet. If the cabinet decides that a law is necessary, a bill is drafted, on occasions, with external inputs. After it is introduced in the two houses, the bill goes through several 'readings', committee hearings and amendments. The final draft is debated and voted on. If a bill secures the requisite majority in both houses, it is sent to the president for assent, upon which the bill becomes an Act. Parliament, in this formal view, is central to the legislative process, and legislation are products of among other things a rational-legal scrutiny and vote. In practice, parliament is less than central; the legislative process rarely confirms to the constitutional ideal type. Take, for example, political parties and their influence on the legislative process. The party to which a government belongs can have a disproportionate say in policy and legislative matters. Indeed, depending on the personalities involved, legislative proposals may even originate and take shape in party headquarters. Or consider a coalition government. A cabinet's decision to introduce a bill may be evidence of compulsion, not necessity. It may be a price for keeping the coalition together or a political maneuvering to secure new allies. Also, consider the influence of non-representative actors and their ability to direct legislative proposals"-- Provided by publisher. (Source: WorldCat)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Includes bibliographical references amd index.

Part I. Origins and Practice:
1. The transplant effect: early origins of ordinances in England and India
2. Surrogate legislation: an empirical account of ordinances, 1952–2009
Part II. Law and Interpretation:
3. Negotiating the text: ordinances, Article 123, and the interpretative deficit
4. Reading minds: presidential satisfaction and judicial review of ordinances
5. The power of no: presidents, cabinets, and the making of ordinances.
Bibliography
Index

"The legislative process in India's parliamentary system, like elsewhere, is a shared exercise: the executive and the legislature partake in it. Ordinarily, proposals for legislation originate in the cabinet. If the cabinet decides that a law is necessary, a bill is drafted, on occasions, with external inputs. After it is introduced in the two houses, the bill goes through several 'readings', committee hearings and amendments. The final draft is debated and voted on. If a bill secures the requisite majority in both houses, it is sent to the president for assent, upon which the bill becomes an Act. Parliament, in this formal view, is central to the legislative process, and legislation are products of among other things a rational-legal scrutiny and vote. In practice, parliament is less than central; the legislative process rarely confirms to the constitutional ideal type. Take, for example, political parties and their influence on the legislative process. The party to which a government belongs can have a disproportionate say in policy and legislative matters. Indeed, depending on the personalities involved, legislative proposals may even originate and take shape in party headquarters. Or consider a coalition government. A cabinet's decision to introduce a bill may be evidence of compulsion, not necessity. It may be a price for keeping the coalition together or a political maneuvering to secure new allies. Also, consider the influence of non-representative actors and their ability to direct legislative proposals"-- Provided by publisher. (Source: WorldCat)

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Facts & Statistics

Printed Books

2132

e - Books

400

Print Journals

27

e - Journals

50

Online Databases

10


© Gujarat National Law University. All Rights Reserved.