000			02676nam a22002417a 4500
003			OSt
005			20250422135224.0
008			240917b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9780367727406
040			_c.
082			_a341.48 _bSAL
100			_aSalzberg Gonzalez, Damian
245			_aResearch Methods for International Human Rights Law: _bBeyond the traditional paradigm / _cedited by Damian Salzberg Gonzalez and Loveday Hodson
260			_aNew york: _bRoutledge Taylor & Francis group, _c2020
300			_a279p.; _c223cm.
505			_a1. Introduction: human rights research beyond the doctrinal approach 2. A Marxist approach to R.M.T. v the United Kingdom 3. A feminist approach to Alyne da Silva Pimentel Teixeira (deceased) v Brazil 4. A postmodern approach to Elisabeta Dano v Jobcenter Leipzig 5. A queer approach to the Advisory Opinion 24/2017 6. A legally pluralistic approach to The Bakassi peninsula case 7. A geographical approach to The Moiwana Community v Suriname 8. A historical approach to Chagos Islanders v the United Kingdom 9. A political approach to Lautsi and others [GC] v Italy 10. An anthropological approach to MSS v Belgium and Greece 11. Human rights research beyond the traditional paradigm: Afterword Conor Gearty 12. Index
520			_aThe study and teaching of international human rights law is dominated by the doctrinal method. A wealth of alternative approaches exists, but they tend to be discussed in isolation from one another. This collection focuses on cross-theoretical discussion that brings together an array of different analytical methods and theoretical lenses that can be used for conducting research within the field. As such, it provides a coherent, accessible and diverse account of key theories and methods. A distinctive feature of this collection is that it adopts a grounded approach to international human rights law, through demonstrating the application of specific research methods to individual case studies. By applying the approach under discussion to a concrete case it is possible to better appreciate the multiple understandings of international human rights law that are missed when the field is only comprehended though the doctrinal method. Furthermore, since every contribution follows the same uniform structure, this allows for fruitful comparison between different approaches to the study of our discipline. ---provided by publisher
650			_aInternational law and human rights Cases
650			_aInternational law and human rights Methodology
700			_aSalzberg-Gonzale, Damian _eEditor
700			_aHodson, Loveday _eEditor
942			_2ddc _cBK
999			_c1996 _d1996